GENERATED — do not edit this file directly. Edit fragments in ./slides/ and rebuild with: ./build.sh fr Fragment list: manifest.fr.txt

Open cold. The quotes around "New" are the whole thesis: the job market isn't new — our awareness of it is. QR up front so latecomers can grab the deck; one beat, then straight into the epigraph.

Hugo : « ceci tuera cela » — le livre imprimé tuera la cathédrale ; chaque technologie détrône l'institution précédente. Poser la question : qu'est-ce que « ceci » aujourd'hui, et que va-t-il tuer ?

"PhD from YouTube / Masters from Instagram" is self-deprecating on purpose — it disarms credentialism before the talk attacks it. The real credential is the 30+ years; the joke buys permission for everything that follows.

Cornelius had to hold still for many minutes for the first selfie to develop (1839). Point: I'm not passing through this topic — I've been sitting in it long enough for the image to develop. Sets up "evidence, not opinions."

The real Apollo 13 line is past tense: "we've HAD a problem." We narrate crises after they've already begun — careers included. Optional: show of hands — "who here thinks the market is fine?" Then advance to the numbers.

The previous slide asked "do we have a problem?" — this one answers it with receipts, before anyone can say it's anecdote. Walk the numbers top to bottom: the listings are partly fake (ghost jobs), the applications go nowhere (36%), the bottom rung of the career ladder is being sawed off (Stanford: −13% for the youngest workers in AI-exposed jobs), the skill set itself has a half-life (39% by 2030), and the technology causing it adopted faster than anything in consumer history (60 days). Same story in the US and in LatAm: the funnel is broken everywhere; only the safety nets differ. Key line: "You are not failing the market. The market is measuring something new, and nobody handed you the new ruler."

Genuinely admire these three scientists — that's the trap of the slide. Don't mock the science; mock the distance. The gap between what's celebrated as important and what pays your rent is the first crack in the map.

This is the audience's real agenda, said out loud. Pause on "investment jobs" — most people have taken one without having the word for it. "Solidarity vs. handouts" lands differently in the US and in LatAm; name that difference and let it sit.

Thoreau en allemand, exprès : le public doit sentir la désorientation avant le sens. Faire deviner l'auteur ; révélation à la diapositive suivante.

Flaubert : Emma rêve la vie qu'on lui a promise ; les gouttières bouchées sont la réalité. Le bovarysme professionnel — carrière imaginée contre carrière vécue.

Core disjunction of the whole talk: the market is global, the economy you live in is local. "Your competition is in Bangalore and Bogotá; your rent is on your street." For a LatAm room, flip it: you ARE the Bogotá competition — the same arbitrage can favor you.

This slide used to be a reading list; now each author carries one blade of the argument. Sequence: Harari says the rules are fictions → Wolff says the fiction is negotiated by power → Sandel says the fiction blames you for losing → Galloway says what the fiction actually pays → Sachs says it can still be engineered differently. "Opportunity vs. meritocracy" is the LatAm/US bridge: the US tells you failure is your fault; much of LatAm never believed the game was fair to begin with. Both audiences recognize Sandel instantly, from opposite directions.

Field of Dreams (1989): faith in building before the audience exists. AI collapses the cost of building, so the quiet, patient builder gets leverage back. "Nerd" here is a temperament — someone who compounds quietly — not an IQ score.

Harari by way of Borges: money, corporations, agency, LLMs — none physically real, all of them move the world. In Tlön, an invented encyclopedia gradually replaces reality. If the rules are fictions, they can be rewritten — that's the hope hidden inside this slide.

Harari: you will need to reinvent yourself again and again. The Milky Way makes time both vast and indifferent — that's the double meaning of "is (isn't) on your side." Bridge to the timeline on the next slide.

The move: zoom out to 4.5 B years, then watch the right-hand column compress — everything below the Web fits inside one working lifetime. Whoever in the room started their career in 1991 has already lived through more technological turnover than the previous ten generations combined. That's the point: reinvention is not a personal failure, it's the era. 2026 row: entry-level work is where AI landed first (Stanford data, previous slides).

P21 framework dates to 2002 — two decades before ChatGPT, which is the point: the 4Cs were always the durable layer. WEF Future of Jobs 2025 top skills (analytical thinking, creative thinking, resilience, collaboration) are basically the 4Cs renamed. Skills get you the interview; the 4Cs survive the automation.

Balzac : Rastignac défie Paris — « À nous deux maintenant ! » L'ambition déclarée avant les moyens. Même mouvement que Twain et del Corral : se déclarer, puis se hisser.

"Let go, Luke." Entitlement, titles, the assumption that the last 30 years' rules describe the next 30. In both cultures titles are identity — this is the emotionally hardest slide of the deck. Slow down here.

Arabica takes 3–4 years to first harvest and 6–8 to full production (National Coffee Association). Nobody yells at the tree to grow faster. Patience, craft, depth: the anti-ghost-job portfolio. Colombian highlands — home ground for the ES audience.

Emerson plus Sartre : « condamné à être libre ». Quand la machine fait la moyenne, l'irreproductible en vous est le seul signal durable.

The point is not to advocate UBI — it's to move it from ideology to math. The three pilots answer the standard objection ("people will stop working") with data: Finland's employment effect was slightly positive; Stockton recipients moved INTO full-time work at twice the control rate; in Kenya nobody worked less, they started businesses. The ILO figure replaces the old unverified "67% of humanity" line: 3.8 B people have no net under them at all — that's the real "who". CUBI is my own framing — participation, not entitlement. Expect pushback from both sides; that's the sign it's calibrated.

Everything cited in the talk lives at gc2.me/refs, updated continuously. Invite follow-ups on X / LinkedIn rather than trying to read sources off the slide.

Camus : il faut imaginer Sisyphe heureux. Le rocher ne disparaît pas ; la résignation, si. Laisser à l'écran pendant les questions.