Posts

I read Pedro Páramo decades ago and thought I had understood it: a haunted town, the dead murmuring to each other across timelines, memory rendered as fog. Returning to it now, a second book sits underneath the first one. Juan Rulfo’s novel is not only a feat of atmosphere. It is a social diagnosis — abuse, incest, patriarchal impunity, and the mechanism by which private violence hardens into public order. The setting is unmistakably Mexican. The grammar it describes is not. …

As a kid in Colombia I had a free subscription to La Pura Verdad — the Spanish edition of The Plain Truth, founded in 1934 by Herbert W. Armstrong and mailed out of Ambassador College in Pasadena, near Los Angeles. It was, unmistakably, evangelical literature: prophecy, end-times reasoning, a specific reading of scripture aimed at conversion. I was never a Christian. Nothing about the magazine’s theology took. And yet I kept reading it, issue after issue, because some of the articles were very good — well-researched, well-written, curious about the world in a way that had nothing to do with doctrine. …

In 1966, at a symposium called “Man the Hunter,” the anthropologist Marshall Sahlins stood up with data other people had already collected — Richard Lee’s fieldwork among the Dobe Ju/‘hoansi of the Kalahari, the Arnhem Land studies from Australia — and said the quiet part out loud. Foragers routinely described as living at the ragged edge of subsistence were, in fact, meeting their needs on something like fifteen to twenty hours of work a week, and spending the rest of their waking hours resting, talking, and doing nothing in particular. Sahlins published the argument, expanded, in Stone Age Economics (1972) under a title designed to sting: “the original affluent society.” Not affluent because foragers had much, but affluent because they wanted little and got it without the compulsion the word “work” now implies. The finding embarrassed a whole civilizational story in which agriculture and industry had liberated humanity from want. They hadn’t. They had invented a new way of being busy, and then made the busyness feel like fate. …

Luca Pacioli did not invent double-entry bookkeeping — Venetian merchants had been using it for at least a century before his 1494 treatise wrote the method down — but he did name the discipline’s real trick. Every transaction gets entered twice, once as a debit and once as a credit, and if the two columns ever fail to match, an error exists somewhere in the world the ledger describes. The genius of the system is not that it records money. It is that it manufactures a built-in alarm for reality not matching the record. Historians of science have mostly ignored this as a source of method, filing it under commerce rather than epistemology. But run the same trick on nature instead of a merchant’s warehouse, and a surprising amount of the history of discovery turns out to be exactly this: someone auditing a ledger, finding it would not close, and naming whatever was missing so it would. …

Mercantilism, the economic doctrine that ran Europe from the sixteenth century to the eighteenth, held that a nation’s wealth was measured in bullion — gold and silver in the vault, full stop. It was a doctrine built around what a ledger could hold. A ship full of spices was wealth only once it had been converted into coin; a colony was valuable only for the specie it could be made to yield. Everything that could not be weighed, stamped, and entered into a column was, for accounting purposes, not there. Adam Smith spent much of The Wealth of Nations (1776) dismantling this confusion of gold with wealth, but the instinct behind it — count what can be counted, and treat the rest as noise — outlived the theory that named it. …

In 1926, fifty years after Bell’s patent, the Knights of Columbus Adult Education Committee circulated a set of discussion questions for its study groups. Two of them, verbatim: Does the telephone make men more active or more lazy? And: Does the telephone break up home life and the old practice of visiting friends? Read them again and swap the noun. Half a century into the technology — not in its novelty phase, not in the first flush of alarm, but two generations deep, when every household that could afford one had one — serious adults were still convening to ask whether the device was making them lazy and dissolving the family. It is this decade’s discourse with the serial numbers filed off. The only thing that has changed in a hundred years is the object on the table. …

Two days ago, in The Photography That Disappeared, I traced what the smartphone did to the economics of the image—attention diluted, the photograph commodified, the decisive moment traded for burst mode. That essay stayed deliberately clinical, and it closed with a promissory note: at the risk of sounding Freudian, or Jungian, there is a second function of photography that has nothing to do with art, and I would come back for it. This is me coming back for it. …

I still type it as “reader digest,” lowercase, the apostrophe and the capital letters missing. My fingers reveal what my memory conceals: I never studied this publication, I absorbed it. It arrived in Spanish, as Selecciones, and it sat on the tables of my childhood the way furniture does — unremarkable, permanent, load-bearing. Decades later I live in the country those pages described. I did not plan this in any way I could document. And yet I have come to believe the magazine was drawing a map the whole time, and that my body, eventually, walked to the place my mind had already been living. …

At a private event not long ago, I lined up what felt like the perfect shot. The light was doing something rare, the composition had assembled itself, and the moment was about to peak. Then, in the same instant, a dozen smartphones rose in front of me. Not out of malice—out of reflex. A wall of glowing rectangles, each capturing the same scene from nearly the same angle, each producing an image that would be indistinguishable from its neighbors. The photograph I was about to take became redundant before it existed. …

Cervantes wrote about women’s rights in the sixteenth century with an angle so sharp it cuts through four hundred years. A beautiful woman, financially independent, who dares to say no—and a man who feels so entitled to her love that his suicide becomes her crime. The most appalling part? His friends, and society, agree. The story comes from Don Quijote, Part I, Chapters 12–14. A young woman named Marcela, orphaned and wealthy, decides to live as a shepherdess in the wilderness rather than marry any of the countless men who pursue her. She is free, self-sufficient, answerable to no one. One of her suitors, Grisóstomo—a brilliant, educated man—becomes consumed by his unrequited love. He follows her into the shepherd’s life, writes melancholic verses, and eventually dies, apparently by his own hand. …